A joint-organism dossier for Cthulhu Eternal
HANDLING WARNING Subjects A and B are not to be interviewed, examined, restrained, rewarded, punished, sedated, or fed separately. Do not give them different names. Do not designate either one “primary,” “original,” “infected,” “host,” or “aggressor.” Reports describe properties of the pair unless an individual distinction is operationally unavoidable. If one subject dies, do not approach the survivor. Do not review the earlier imaging. Do not ask surviving personnel whether the survivor always had its present anatomy. The answer will be yes.
Incident report: St. Orison
The first body was recovered under St. Orison Hospital after a power failure opened a crack between two foundation piers. It looked human, female, about thirty, badly dehydrated, unable to give its name. Blue material coated its palms and the soles of its feet. It was designated Subject A. Nine minutes later a second body was recovered from an electrical substation 312 kilometres away: human, male, about thirty, badly dehydrated, unable to give its name, the same blue material on its palms and soles. It was designated Subject B.
Their fingerprints did not match. Their DNA established no ordinary relationship. Asked where they had come from, both drew the same floor plan, and each drew half the rooms. Subject A knew the names of Subject B’s nurses. Subject B knew that Subject A was allergic to penicillin before the allergy test was run. When A slept, B entered REM sleep within forty seconds. When B was startled, A’s pulse rose first. The bodies were kept apart.
B turned violent on the fourth day. It struck an orderly and made for a service corridor with an untreated ninety-degree junction in it. A stayed cooperative. The oversight committee authorized euthanasia of B and retention of A for study. At 08:13, B got a lethal intravenous dose. At 08:14, A’s existing radiographs were pulled, and every image showed a second mandible folded behind the first, dense plating under the skin, and elongated attachment points down the spine; three radiologists insisted those structures had been there when the images were taken. At 08:16 an orderly reported that A had bitten him two days earlier, and his forearm held a healing wound matching A’s newly visible inner jaw, though the original incident report named B as the attacker and its text had not changed. At 08:18 A asked why the staff had killed “the part that knew how to be harmless.” At 08:19 every interior door in the containment wing opened toward A regardless of its hinges. Thirty-one people died. Killing one subject created the distinction the staff thought they had already found.
Continue reading »